Back to jobs
Stryker10K+ employees

Machine Operator II - 3rd Shift - $21.90 + $1.50 Shift Premium

Kalamazoo, MISalary not listedPosted 2 days ago

Immigration summary

Visa sponsorship

LikelyLow confidence

This employer sponsors, but not for roles like this one.

72 recent H-1B filings

View visa evidence

Green card sponsorship

Strong historyMedium confidence

This employer has recently sponsored green cards at scale.

25 recent certified PERM filings

View green card evidence

Job description

Work Flexibility: Onsite

3rd shift: Sunday - Thursday 10:00 pm - 6:30 am

What You Will Do:

  • Under general supervision, operate machinery and inspect machined components using precision measuring equipment while keeping accurate production records and maintenance logs  
  • Adhere to site specific quality systems and processes  
  • Identify and accurately record scrap, maintenance requests, and production documents  
  • Operate simple manufacturing equipment, demonstrate machining/mechanical aptitude, and learn new responsibilities and tasks as needed  
  • Train others on operational and/or documentation procedures as needed  
  • Identify and appropriately report safety concerns, production issues, and documentation errors.  
  • Assist execution of continuous improvement projects.  
  • Effectively collaborate with peers, functional departments, and visitors of Stryker  

What You Need:

Preferred

  • High School or GED  
  • 2+ Years of Manufacturing Experience  
  • Blueprint reading, measuring tools – calipers, micrometers, gauges  

$21.90 + $1.50 Shift Premium per hour plus bonus eligible + benefits.

Travel Percentage: None

Stryker Corporation is an equal opportunity employer. Qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, or protected veteran status. Stryker is an EO employer – M/F/Veteran/Disability.

Stryker Corporation will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against employees or applicants because they have inquired about, discussed, or disclosed their own pay or the pay of another employee or applicant. However, employees who have access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of their essential job functions cannot disclose the pay of other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to compensation information, unless the disclosure is (a) in response to a formal complaint or charge, (b) in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or (c) consistent with the contractor’s legal duty to furnish information.

Sponsorship evidence

Why Openbound reached the conclusions above.

Visa sponsorship evidence

Current posting

Silent on sponsorship

Employer H-1B history

72
recent certified H-1B filings
27
new-hire petitions
0
filings for similar roles
51
so far in FY2026
More evidence details
  • 72 recent certified H-1B filings across the employer
  • Still filing this year — 51 filings in FY2026
  • 34 USCIS H-1B new-employment approvals, counted separately from LCA filings
  • Strong filing activity in MI
  • 176 further USCIS approvals for extensions or transfers
  • We checked 140 filing titles for this employer and none describe work like this role
  • The posting says nothing about sponsorship either way

Strong filing activity in MI.

Green card sponsorship evidence

Employer PERM history

25
recent certified PERM filings
0
filings for similar roles
14
filings in this location
Certified PERM filings by fiscal year
202324
202413
202533
202615YTD

Filing history reflects past employer behavior; it isn't a promise for this opening.

All open roles at Stryker
How Openbound evaluates sponsorship

Visa history uses official U.S. Department of Labor H-1B LCA disclosure data and USCIS H-1B petition history. Green card history uses DOL PERM disclosure data. Each is read for the employer as a whole, for roles like this one, and for this location, weighted toward the most recent fiscal years.

An employer is matched to its filing entities by verified legal name and reviewed aliases; a match is never made on a name resemblance alone. Where no verified entity can be matched, the page says so and draws no conclusion from the absence. 140 filing titles were examined for this employer.

What this posting states outranks history in both directions, and an employer's published policy outranks past filings. Filing history reflects past behavior; it is not a promise of sponsorship for this opening, and none of this is legal advice.